<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chapter 42 &#187; carrots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chapter42.whitewhale.net/tag/carrots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chapter42.whitewhale.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:20:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>In the Age of Twitter, an Idle Mind Has Never Been More Important</title>
		<link>http://chapter42.whitewhale.net/2009/04/10/the-age-of-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://chapter42.whitewhale.net/2009/04/10/the-age-of-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cumin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idleness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitewhale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chapter42.whitewhale.net/?p=293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter is changing my life, kind of.
I was a late adopter compared to most people— it&#8217;s only in the last month or so that I&#8217;ve been taking an active interest in it.  (The day I started to get into using it, they mentioned it on the Daily Show.)  Now I use it to communicate with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is changing my life, kind of.</p>
<p>I was a late adopter compared to most people— it&#8217;s only in the last month or so that I&#8217;ve been taking an active interest in it.  (The day I started to get into using it, they mentioned it on the Daily Show.)  Now I use it to communicate with clients, friends, or students at the schools we&#8217;re working with; to shoot the breeze with my co-workers, some of whom work in distant cities; and sometimes simply to spout off about whatever, just like everyone else.  I used to Twitter a lot about Twitter.</p>
<p>Mostly I think of Twitter as a way to reinforce White Whale&#8217;s fundamental message: that five people can run and grow a moderately successful business, and in the process change <em>nothing</em> about the way we express ourselves: in a nutshell, that the people we are online are the same people we are in person. (I think the same goes for my four co-workers <a href="http://twitter.com/tonyalangford" target="_blank">Tonya</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/alexwhitewhale" target="_blank">Alex</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/dtetto" target="_blank">Donald</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/janieporche" target="_blank">Janie</a>.)  We don&#8217;t practice much message control because we don&#8217;t really have much to hide. (Whatever I <em>do</em> have to say that&#8217;s worth hiding, I express on <a href="http://bokardo.com/archives/relationship-symmetry-in-social-networks-why-facebook-will-go-fully-asymmetric/" target="_blank">symmetrical networks only</a>.)</p>
<p>Although the 140-character short form initially seemed too restrictive, I&#8217;m now finding it a great source of inspiration.  Here is what I think is perhaps the most perfect tweet ever written, by my old friend @<a href="http://twitter.com/johnpavelkehlen">johnpavelkehlen</a>:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img style="margin-left: 20px; margin-right: 20px;" title="picture-6" src="http://chapter42.whitewhale.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/picture-6.png" alt="picture-6" /></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, and maybe it&#8217;s just because I miss my old friend&#8217;s company, but I can imagine myself dining with John and his friend in his little garret pretty easily reading that, and he didn&#8217;t need a single extra character to express it.  As John himself reminded me, brevity is the soul of wit, and never has that felt more technologically true.</p>
<p>Having said all that, I worry a little about the effect Twitter is having on me.</p>
<p>For one thing, I&#8217;m <em>on </em>much more than usual these days.  I move through the world with an active and engaged brain. I see things as I&#8217;m walking to work (today it was an odd misspelling on a sign) and think, should I Twitter this? (I&#8217;m convinced that the verb is &#8220;to Twitter,&#8221; not &#8220;to tweet.&#8221;)  A thought occurs to me.  It feels sorta profound. Is it profound enough to become a tweet?  And if so, will it affect my <a href="http://followcost.com/jasonpontius" target="_blank">follow cost</a>?</p>
<p>I like to think that when I&#8217;m working at my best, I have a fairly sharp eye for detail and nuance; thanks to Twitter, I carry this eye around with me much more than I used to, and these details and nuances hang around.  I&#8217;m worried LOST is going over the top with this &#8220;judging Ben&#8221; thing.  I enjoy Bonterra&#8217;s organic Zinfandel. I really love my bank.  Which of these things should I broadcast?  <a href="http://twitter.com/jasonpontius/status/1472310728" target="_blank" style="font-size:.7em; font-weight:normal;">(answer)</a>  In a nutshell, I never thought I&#8217;d spend so much time qualitatively evaluating my own thoughts.</p>
<p>So after a day spent out in the world this way, I sit down to dinner with <a title="Kate Schatz: Experimental Soup Making II" href="http://experimentalsoupmaking.blogspot.com" target="_blank">my wife</a>.  Am I going to Twitter about how great dinner was?  Or what a wonderful evening I&#8217;m having?</p>
<p>Of course not.  Because that&#8217;s my time, not yours. But the temptation is very strong!  And I <a href="http://twitter.com/jasonpontius/status/1452635258" target="_blank">don&#8217;t always</a> resist it.</p>
<p>I am learning to control the impulse to chronicle my leisure time; this is largely because White Whale is <a href="http://2007.whitewhale.net/content/small.php" target="_blank">my company</a>, Twitter is partially a work thing, and if I let work bleed into every corner of my life it would destroy me.  But I can tell that it&#8217;s changing people, and I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s always for the better.</p>
<p>I see people, friends of mine, twittering about how they just woke up, or they&#8217;re happy, or it&#8217;s a beautiful day.  Is the chronicling of that experience (and the cognitive and physical processes required to make it happen) interfering with the plain appreciation of the fact?  I can&#8217;t see how it doesn&#8217;t.  <a href="http://twitter.com/fogfish" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s a guy who Twitters a hundred times per day.</a> (Don&#8217;t ask about <a href="http://followcost.com/fogfish">his follow cost</a>.)  People like that used to be considered wackos or oddballs (like 2004 presidential candidate Bob Graham, a compulsive <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/26158/Bob-Grahams-diary">diarist</a>)— now they&#8217;re just high-tech, plugged-in people.</p>
<p>But does anyone worry about the long term effects of this way of relating to the world?  It seems like the opposite of ADD— Attention Surplus Disorder.  I wonder if the most active Twitterers among us ever will ever enjoy the pleasure of a blank mind, an hour spent staring into space, etc. What we now think of as &#8220;vegging out&#8221; is what they used to call &#8220;relaxation.&#8221;  Actions that now might be considered downright <em>yogic</em>— like simply not speaking for a couple of hours— used to be the norm, I&#8217;m sure, at a less frantic time in human history.</p>
<p>For now, it&#8217;s fun.  I like keeping tabs on what my friends are eating, reading, listening to, or coding.  It&#8217;s an enjoyably odd feeling to know what very casual business acquaintances think about certain TV shows.</p>
<p>But in the long term, will the people who engage most deeply with technology lose the ability to exist quietly in the world it&#8217;s brought us?</p>
<p>Note: 140 characters exactly in that last paragraph. Bam!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chapter42.whitewhale.net/2009/04/10/the-age-of-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

