Posts tagged with ‘whitewhale’:

John Updike on business travel

I haven’t read any novels by John Updike (1932-2009), but I’m a fan of his short poems.  In particular, he has a poem about business travelers— a topic near and dear to my heart— that I’ve always loved (especially for its last lines).  In honor of his passing, here it is.

The Overhead Rack 

Worst of all, and most hated by me
as I sit docilely crammed into my seat,
crammed and strapped like a psychotic in restraints,
are these bland-faced complacent graduates
of business school, trained to give each other
and the rest of the poor world the business,
who attempt to stuff their not one but two folding bags
big enough to hold an army of business suits
into the overhead rack, already crammed
with traveling crap like a constipated ox’s
intestine. The blond doors cannot lower,
the hats and hags of earlier arrivals
are crushed. Why don’t the smug smooth bastards check
their preening polyester wardrobes and
proliferating printouts, sheaf on sheaf,
at the ticket counter, or, better yet,
stay home and attend to their neglected wives
and morose, TV-mesmerized offspring
instead of crowding their slick and swollen bags
and egos onto my airplane, my tube in space, my
clean shot home? Like slats of a chicken coop
overrunning with dung are the overhead racks.
If we crash, thus overloaded, the world
will yield up a grateful sigh at the headlines:
one less batch of entrepreneurs to dread.
Ohkillkillkill, I think, watching the filth
strap itself in, exhaling export beer
and nasal exchanges of professional dirt,
these fat corpuscles in the nation’s bloodstream:
oh, would I were a flying macrophage
to eat them all, their bags and all, and excrete
the vaporizing lava into space!

I love to imagine Updike writing this poem on the plane.  

I encounter these guys all the time, and will be sure not to become one.

Don’t Make Me Think About How Stupid the Title of Steve Krug’s Book Is

Douglas’ blog post yesterday contained lots of interesting points about how computers communicate with users.  It’s true that applications ought to speak in human language, not computer-speak; as Donald has also pointed out, it’s crazy to ask a user to “Attach Resource” when what she really wants to do is put an image on a Web page.  In all our work, especially our work on LiveWhale, we try really hard to keep a focus on making things transparent (even fun) for our users, and we talk (and email and IM and videochat) constantly about the best ways to achieve that goal.

But that’s not what I’m here to write about today.

Read more »

Communicating in plain English

At this point, we’ve all been barraged by Krug’s “don’t make me think” mantra a nearly infinite amount of times.  I remember the first time I heard this phrase: sitting in Web 1 class, learning how to code html the “right” way.  Our instructor was raging on about standard web design conventions, how one should be careful not to stray too far outside of the box, but rather tiptoe around its perimeter so as to not confuse the average internet user.  “Don’t make me think,” he said.  Now, don’t get me wrong, I completely agree with the fact that the user interface and information architecture shouldn’t get in the way of what you are trying to do on any given web site, but sorry, I rather like thinking.   Read more »

Coding Ahead of Yourself

When you’re maintaining a software product which evolves and expands in order to remain competitive and make itself more useful to a user base, it’s easy to forget to keep all the moving parts in line with changes and new features as you roll them out. However, if this issue isn’t dealt with, bugs and performance issues will inevitably arise.

LiveWhale, our CMS, is essentially a module-based system. Individual modules can be provided to our customers on a per-client basis. Each module is a self-contained element, that “registers” itself in the CMS framework, thereby establishing its functionality throughout. A module is responsible for creating and managing its own data, but if it is flagged as group owned, access to that data is handled by LiveWhale’s users and groups system. Read more »

The Uncommon Application, Part I: The personal touch

I have made no secret of the fact that White Whale would jump at the chance to develop a customized college admission application.

More and more of our clients are moving to the Common Application— in most cases that’s because homegrown applications tend to be unwieldy and hard to manage, and it’s easy to see how tempting it’d be to outsource that whole process— information gathering, account creation, payment collection, reporting, security, etc.— to a third party.  I don’t know if the Common App is a publicly held company, but I wouldn’t say no to a gift of stock options if they were.

However.  Although the Common App is certainly a convenient way to manage the process of college admission, doesn’t it feel like a missed opportunity?

The process of applying to college is an anxious, scary time, as anyone who’s ever done it can attest.  With a very few exceptions, nobody’s going to be accepted everywhere they apply.  So in applying, you know you’ll be rejected somewhere, and the kind of self-revelation required in a good college application adds a fear of exposure to the process.   (At least that’s what it was like for me.)

If that’s the case, it seems that a college or university could do a great deal to alleviate this anxiety— and build a relationship with the prospective student— by presenting her with a thoughtful, friendly, easy to use, customized, streamlined and responsive, online application.

The first step in applying using the Common App looks like this:

Common App opening screen

Wouldn’t it be better if the first page started like this?

Hi.

It’s great that you’re applying to Middlebury.  Our applicant pool always includes an incredibly diverse group of interesting and thoughtful young people from around the country and around the world.  The students that join Middlebury next fall will become part of a close-knit academic community; we expect a lot from our students, and we give a lot in return.  In other words, we aren’t just looking for the best students, we’re looking for the best neighbors.

We’re looking forward to reading your application. If you have any questions at all about the process, e-mail John Doe, our online application support counselor, at JohnDoe@middlebury.edu.

To get started, enter your first and last name below.

We know from experience that students choose colleges based on direct connections.  Sometimes it’s a friend they made touring campus; sometimes it’s a favorite book by an alumni author; sometimes it’s a discussion on Facebook.  Sometimes university Web sites include tools that encourage connections as well— for example, Haverford will occasionally let a select group of admits or top prospects create student profiles, and we’re working on a project for Lewis & Clark that will let prospective students create customized portal pages just like faculty, staff and current students.

The question is, why can’t that sense of personal contact extend to the application itself? I’ve suggested some of the most typical reasons why colleges go to the Common App— convenience, security, stability, etc.  These are all fine reasons to outsource the application; there are other reasons too.  It is undeniably more convenient for the *applicant* to only enter their information one time and apply to multiple colleges at once.  Web database development projects done in-house are notoriously hard to maintain over time; this is one reason why schools’ own online applications are often a little clunky.  And there aren’t many companies that offer customized application development.

(The reason for this last case are clear.  The perfect online application would be the better mousetrap, and it’s hard to even think about how you’d build a college application without seeing visions of how the world of higher ed would beat a path to your door.)

But it’s my belief that when the right school— unsatisfied with the Common App, wanting to create personal contact with applicants, and without the staff or the time to develop an application in house— meets the right Web development vendor, a few steps might be taken toward an online application that will itself do some of the work of recruiting great applicants.

Consider this blog post a want ad; I think we’re the right company for that job, and if anybody’s interested in talking about it, let me know.  Over the next several days I’ll be posting a few more thoughts on this topic— how an application might reach out and speak directly to students, building connections in the process.  If anyone else has any ideas about what the ideal application might do, please drop me a line.

Converting to Title Case

In the process of developing and refining our CMS, the question occasionally arises whether or not we should convert text inputs from format X to format Y.  These questions range from the innocuous and straightforward (should we convert curly quotes to straight quotes?  or vice versa?) to the more insidious (should we correct a misspelling?  should we move close quotes to outside a period?).  

On the one hand, it’s probably best to let users make mistakes, or format as they wish, and depend on human communication to clear things up— instead of trying to build in a bunch of extra structure designed to cover for mistakes.  It’s our view that the latter approach leads to bloated, overbuilt CMS systems that discourage accountability.  But at the same time, consistency and coherence of communication across a Web site is a really, really important thing— it is what distinguishes sites that serve as good vehicles for an institution’s messaging from sites that are just decorated Web pages.

We’re thinking about this right now because we are considering automatically converting the titles of news items in LiveWhale to Title Case.  The following three news headlines, though identical in content, send very different messages:

1.  White Whale Web Services to Release New Content Management System, Revolutionize CMS Industry
 

2.  White Whale Web Services to release new content management system, revolutionize CMS industry
 

3.  WHITE WHALE WEB SERVICES TO RELEASE NEW CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, REVOLUTIONIZE CMS INDUSTRY
 

Although there might be a justification for #3 in a particular Web design, it’s clear that you wouldn’t want a user to enter news headlines that way.  For one thing, caps are just hard to read in many contexts; but on top of that, it’s always easy to {text-transform:uppercase} if you need caps.  My general preference as a design snob would be for #2, but that’s clearly not common practice— as much as I enjoy headlines like this (or this), that style is much more common in European news than American.

It’s also the case that styles #1 and #2 look terrible next to each other:

  • White Whale Web Services to Release New Content Management System, Revolutionize CMS Industry
  • Other CMS providers cower in fear

So.  Should we let users do what they will, and enter headlines according to any system they prefer?  Or should we legislate something?  It seems pretty clear from the above examples that— at least in the particular case of news headlines— legislating is the way to go.  And if you’re going to require a particular format for headlines, it seems pretty clear that Title Case Is Your Only Option.

So what’s the best way to do it?

Read more »

Writing better thank-yous

Call it a pet peeve, but I find it very annoying to get e-mails like this:




In other words, a response to an email I’ve sent with only the reply “Thanks!”

Now, I know why these emails exist— to acknowledge receipt of my message.  But I trust the Web, and so I’m assuming it was received anyway— and whenever the email bell rings, and I see there’s a message from a client or business contact, I stop what I’m doing to open Mail and check it out, and whenever it’s a Thanks! I can’t help but feel a bit prickly, for having interrupted a creative stream for several seconds to find out something I already assumed.  I know it’s a little petty, but when you’re  juggling lots of tasks, a relatively content-free email like that seems superfluous and unnecessary.

Contrast this with an email I got a couple of days ago:




The effect an email like this has is completely different.  By adding just a few extra words to this quick thank-you message, the author let me know that the sentiment was truly sincere: that the letter I’d sent had a positive impact.  The difference is so minor— between spending three seconds on a response and spending ten seconds— but the resulting email really made my day.

So now I’m resolved to do a better job of writing thank-you messages myself; I’ll commit to spending 10-15 seconds elaborating why an email was particularly helpful, timely or informative. If I can’t make the time for an even marginally thoughtful or heartfelt response, I won’t clutter the mail servers of the world with a content-free return receipt.

What wedding insurance doesn’t cover

To briefly digress from higher ed web development:

I’m getting married in a week.  (Thanks, I’m excited too!)  We have to get wedding insurance— something I’d never heard of— for our weekend-long wedding in the wilds of northern California.

Here is the list of exclusions in our policy:

Exclusions: Claims by Athletic Participants, War, Terrorism, Expected or Intended Injury, Sexual Abuse/Molestation, Asbestos, Nuclear Energy, Total Pollution, Fungi or Bacteria, Aircraft or Watercraft, Pyrotechnics, Employment Related Practices, Communicable Disease (Hepatitis, TSE, HIV, HTLV, or AIDS) Collapse of Temporary Structure, Lead Liability, Professional Liability, Use of Trampolines, Cheerleading Pyramids, Sale/Manufacture/Distribution of Athletic Equipment, Use of Saunas or Tanning Devices, Polo, Skin & Scuba Diving, Squash, Downhill Snow Skiing, Water Skiing, Whitewater Rafting, Bungee Jumping, Mountain Climbing, Rock Climbing, Motorsports, Rodeo or any Equestrian Related Sports, Waterslides, Ballooning, Parachute Jumping, Luge, Tobogganing, Gymnastics, All Motor Sports, Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act or CAN-SPAM Act.

How can we be expected to have any fun at all if we can’t play squash or violate the CAN-SPAM act?

Read more »

How many Web services can one person use?

A post on the NY Times Bits blog points out that there are only so many social networking services any one person can keep up with on any given day.  I know this is certainly true in my case.  I’m always talking to clients about the relative importance of Web 2.0 and social networking tools to their higher-education concerns, but the fact is that I can barely keep our own blog updated, let alone check in on my Facebook page or remember to post chatty musings to Twitter.

Who are these people who maintain accounts with Tumblr, Stumbleupon, LinkedIn, Mixxd, and CrowdVine— what do they do all day?  How do they get any work done?  

(OK, I made up Mixxd. But I think the others are real.)

Update: Tony from CrowdVine comments that CV’s network is transient— used primarily during conferences for attendees to let each other know which sessions are “hot.”  That’s a good point— it’s easy to understand how transient, explicitly function-oriented tools can be useful, and if CrowdVine’s efforts really are directed at serving temporary social networks like conferences, I wish them well.  It’s a good idea.

How not to communicate with prospective clients by email

Because we’re building a CMS, I am on the mailing lists of several CMS service providers, and quite often receive email from these companies.  Usually the messages I get are pretty marketing-heavy, kind of spammy, easily ignored.  But I just got this from Hobson’s:

I have heard from several past clients that Hobson’s doesn’t offer much in the way of customer service—  they seem to be a company that earns its money by buying up any higher-ed-related tool with market share and repackaging it as part of a “platform.”  Judging from this email—which, as you can see, showed up in my inbox with no content whatsoever, and a reply-to link to the mysterious “myvippage.net”— they put about as much thought and work into email marketing as they do into innovation and technology.